"A
game of golf, which had rather serious consequences for one of the players,
had an interesting sequel at Tullamore Circuit Court Thursday week, when
Edward McCabe, Lansdowne Park, Portarlington claimed £300 damages
against Mrs. Elsie O'Sullivan, Garryhinch,in respect of injuries sustained
through her alleged negligence.
Mr. B. Fitzpatrick, B.L. (instructed by Mr. A. Rolleston, Solr.), was
for the plaintiff; and Mr. B. Hannin, B.L. (instructed by Mr. V. E. Kirwan,
Solr. for defendant.
The accident, Mr. Fitzpatrick explained occurred at a meeting of the Portarlington
Golf Club on 31st May, 1941.Plaintiff stated he was a farmer and a member
of the Portarlington Golf Club. On 31st May, 1941, he was playing in a
game in which three partners started out. Mrs. Hogan being witness's partner.
Defendant's partner was Mr. Hainsworth, the remaining couple consisting
of two ladies. There was nothing eventful until they got to the sixth
fairway.Witness played his stroke and his ball went to the extreme left,
about 100 yards from the green. He then went to Mrs. Hogan and discussed
the merits of her shot with her, and during the talk there was a noticeable
rattle in her club. After a moment she put her hand on his arm and said:"Oh,
mind" Mrs. O'Sullivan was about to play and he turned around to avoid
her. The next thing was a "crack" on the mouth, which put him
into semi-conscious condition. Later he was attended by Dr. Hogan. The
denture in witness's mouth was broken, the blow driving it into his upper
llip and jaw. The club first struck him on the chin. As a result of the
injuries he spent a fortnight in hospital in Dublin, but he was now considerably
better. From the time of the accident he was unable to do any work until
October last.
Replying to the Judge, he said that while in the Richmond Hospital he
was vomiting blood for two or three days, and he could eat nothing for
a week. Having left hospital he went home for a week, after which he spent
a fortnight in the Spa Hotel, Lucan.
Further examination, he said he had 174 acres of land. Some time after
the accident he had a conversation with the defendant, who volunteered
to pay for his "keep", and said she was at fault.
Plaintiff was cross-examined by Mr. Hannin as to how the accident occurred.
Are you an experienced golfer? -I have been playing for fourteen or
fifteen years.
I take it you know the rules, as well as the etiquette, of playing golf?
He agreed, in further cross-examination, that he walked with and talked
to his lady partner without looking at the other competitors in the game.
He did not break any of the rules of etiquette regarding the game.
On the Occasion of the accident he did not know that the defendant was
going to play her shot, and it was up to her to tell him if he was in
the way.
She
must not have seen him before playing her shot.When asked if he had not
been hit he would have apologised to Mrs.O'Sullivan, he replied: "I
cannot answer that question".
Do you think it is her duty to proclaim to the wide world that she is
going to take a shot? It is her duty to see that the coast is clear.
.The judge inquired in what way had there been negligence, and the wItness
replied that he had no idea Mrs. O'Sullivan was behind him at the time.
Mrs. Hogan said, "Mind! Mrs. O'Sullivan is going to play", and
then he got the "crack". He could not possibly have avoided
being hit. If he had known she was there he would not have got in the
way.
Dr. W. Hogan said he examined plaintiff after the accident. Plaintiff
was very shocked. His lips were swollen and he was bleeding a little.
There was a deep cut on the inside of the upper lip and the upper denture
was broken, and there were several cuts on the palate, around the gums.
The natural teeth were shaken up and oozing a little blood. He had made
a wonderful recovery.
At this stage Mr. Hannin asked for a direction on the question of negligence,
but the Judge allowed the case to proceed.
Harold Hainsworth, secretary of the golf club, was examined. He said he
played in the competition in question, his partner being Mrs. O'Sullivan.
He saw defendant taking her stance at the ball, and at that time plaintiff
was not within the swing of her club. With Mrs. Hogan he was walking towards
her, being behind, and witness was in the act of shouting to them when
Mrs. Hogan got a way from the danger and tried to pull plaintiff with
her, but did not pull him far enough. .."
The court, however, ruled in favour of the defendant and the plaintiff's
claim for damages failed.
|